This is mostly a food blog , but sometimes a tech article I read on-line sparks my attention.
and now the news from the current political elections is un-escapable for the most part
How U.S. Lost Out on IPhone Work
NY Times, Business Day ,The Economy
By CHARLES DUHIGG and KEITH BRADSHER
Published: January 21, 2012
my comments:
Asia is the leader of large scale manufacturing. This
article focuses on the electronics industry.
notes:
“Companies once felt an obligation to support American
workers, even when it wasn’t the best financial choice,”
said Betsey Stevenson, the chief economist at the Labor
Department until last September. “That’s disappeared.
Profits and efficiency have trumped generosity.”
(a)this was creating jobs for the sake of creating jobs.
"…a current Apple executive said. “We don’t have an
obligation to solve America’s problems. Our only
obligation is making the best product possible.”
(b)this is focusing on making a product, not influenced by political distractions
…
"For technology companies, the cost of labor is
minimal compared with the expense of buying parts and
managing supply chains that bring together components
and services from hundreds of companies. For Mr. Cook,
the focus on Asia “came down to two things,” said one
former high-ranking Apple executive. Factories in Asia
“can scale up and down faster” and “Asian supply chains
have surpassed what’s in the U.S.” The result is that
“we can’t compete at this point,” the executive said. "
"Another critical advantage for Apple was that China
provided engineers at a scale the United States could
not match. Apple’s executives had estimated that about
8,700 industrial engineers were needed to oversee and
guide the 200,000 assembly-line workers eventually
involved in manufacturing iPhones. The company’s
analysts had forecast it would take as long as nine
months to find that many qualified engineers in the
United States. In China, it took 15 days. "
(c)Other countries are set up demographically and geographically to make efficient use of manufacturing
supply chains and labor for mass production in shorter time spans. They have the resources and control
mastered.
Other governments support and motivate a national pride towards production and manufacturing versus individual
financial gain (very debatable) and have the qualified work force ready. Some governments are better at a
growing a service economy.
It seems that Asia is the only place to build fast moving (changing technology) products in great numbers at a price that makes
them affordable.
What does that leave us, the U.S. ? In the technical field; programming? software development?
So here is a follow up question , if you will: Multiple choice, no correct answer(s) at this time
What is the United States better suited at producing?
What ones will grow or shrink or remain the same?
(a) legal professionals
(b) Doctors
(c) political parties/ politicians
(d) health care systems
(e) financial/credit systems
(f) welfare systems
(g) an up to date infrastructure
(h) discourse
(i) non-profit organizations and exemptions(too many to list)
(j) Research and development
(k) Political Action Committees
(l) an affordable education system
(m) a chaotic tax code (AKA red tape)
(n) regulations
(o) benefit packages
(n) small businesses/manufacturing
(p) artistic expression
(q) agriculture
(r) defense/law enforcement
(s) computer programming/servicing/software development
add your own
I’m poking fun at the USA, this is who we are. A diverse culture. Asia has it’s problems too, and no telling where they will be after 15-20 years.
No doubt though that hobbies should be encouraged as they were in past. They are the first step in education of the trades.
Have they been displaced by dismissing them as nonsense as they have no social redeeming value? Personally speaking, a home with out a work bench is not a home.












The valuation of electrons
Tags: facebook, IPO, stock.AI, TECH
Unless you’ve had your head buried in the sand about financial news, Facebook will be offered to investors as an issuance of stock. Since this is the first issue of stock to the general public, know as an IPO, there has been some speculation as how much the stock will be offered and at what price each share will be. Estimates would value Facebook at $95 Billion. !!!
What exactly is Facebook ? Oh, it’s a social network (internet) site that just about anyone on the internet knows about. But what IS Facebook, is their headquarters worth billions? You can’t touch Facebook unless you want fingerprints all over your display, monitor screen or smart phone.
What you getting for your share of stock is a bunch of electrons. These electrons of course are arranged by the knowledge workers at Facebook. It’s the softwear or instructions that allow users to interact or more importantly format information into a readable and interact able design (website). It’s customizable within formats to allow the user(s) to have their contacts, friends, relatives, likes and dislikes organized for easy viewing and feedback. Facebook doesn’t build hardware like computers and smartphones. Facebook just arranges electrons in a way that’s popular to the general public.
This isn’t a new concept, software isn’t a new concept. If a product can be digitized , it can be bought or sold with out it physically existing. Did your ever open a video game cartridge to actually see what was in it. Basically circuits to order the electrons of your game console. A floppy disk, just a collection of magnetic pulses, optical disks? the same, just a collection of miniature reflections from a rotating surface to order the electrons by instructions and information read by a light (laser) beam.
Enter the internet, we even don’t need the media anymore, the electrons are passed back and forth by computers now globally connected. Over a period of time, by digitizing, media formats were laid to rest, photography went digital, now publishing actual print is dying. Music, download is the key word. Even financial, a swipe or pass of the RFID plastic is all it takes, the obsolete media is paper money and checks.
What the winning element is is that the software is a generally accepted user interface. If a software company can get it right and accepted by the masses, grow and improve the interface, it wins. Popularity makes up a good portion of the value. So does it’s ability to be a place for advertisements and ripe for data mining of it’s customers.
How much are we willing to pay for the orderly arrangement of electrons? Time will tell, maybe the next consideration won’t be what OS (Operating System) you’ll have on your digital device but what AI system you’ll have.
Share this:
Like this: