How the perception of laziness conflicts leisure lifestyle.
Many years ago those who predicted that computers, automation and other advancements would free us from labor and offer us more leisure time, in my opinion were right. This was way back with the proliferation of computers, internet and even those who saw that email was a game changer. The electronic cottage was envisioned.
(I would look up statistics on how the post office evolved to cope with the loss of letter size mail, with the introduction of email, ebilling, and epayment systems, perhaps shifting to be competitive with package delivery.)
The conflict though, is for some to accept the fact that fewer people will be doing physical work and possibly less travel to procure goods and more travel for pleasure, for example and more free thinking and embrace it rather than disrupting it. As a side note, doesn’t your cable/ internet provider promote that you now have all the entertainment choices available in high definition wide-screen with digital surround audio seen from your favorite recliner instead of going to the local theater ?
In technical terms, the less wear and tear you put on a machine the longer it lasts. Could the same be said about people? It won’t be a fair comparison as the human body has some regenerative properties but overall some have the lack of foresight to use tools available to them to lessen the physical load. Others in society will welcome the less labor output as they don’t have the same physical resources of others.
On an individual level, if goods and services can be delivered at the same price as one physically going to another location and back using your own resources, you’d already saved resources. Going to a store, or other point of purchase, consumes energy and labor. Could this be shifted to another use? Thinking, creativity, relaxation, social time? Would you use your total labor output it terms of work hours more efficiently, or reduce the number of work hours you require to get the job done?
If a physically active lifestyle is ingrained in someones mentality, then it may be harder to accept the ideals of others who promote a leisure, less physical labor life and use available saving tools to achieve it. The total physical labor of a system is decreasing and if the total amount of people able to work at physically demanding employment decreases at the same rate then the system would equalize no shift is required.
As far as those who promote a healthy robust activity filled lifestyle the leisure lifestyle may appear as an ill of society. Years ago seniors were encouraged to “get off your rocker”as a reference to sitting in a rocking chair. Now with a laptop, internet and AI assistants more can be done in less travel and labor output and as I agree physical stagnation could be a problem, it’s not always an evil thing to sit back and relax once and awhile and let the machine do the work.
Truly, laziness is not a factor if one figures better ways to use his/her labor to achieve a goal rather than avoiding or procrastinating the goal.
pass this along my friend....
Like this:
Like Loading...
conflicts of interest
Tags: comment, labor, leisure
How the perception of laziness conflicts leisure lifestyle.
Many years ago those who predicted that computers, automation and other advancements would free us from labor and offer us more leisure time, in my opinion were right. This was way back with the proliferation of computers, internet and even those who saw that email was a game changer. The electronic cottage was envisioned.
(I would look up statistics on how the post office evolved to cope with the loss of letter size mail, with the introduction of email, ebilling, and epayment systems, perhaps shifting to be competitive with package delivery.)
The conflict though, is for some to accept the fact that fewer people will be doing physical work and possibly less travel to procure goods and more travel for pleasure, for example and more free thinking and embrace it rather than disrupting it. As a side note, doesn’t your cable/ internet provider promote that you now have all the entertainment choices available in high definition wide-screen with digital surround audio seen from your favorite recliner instead of going to the local theater ?
In technical terms, the less wear and tear you put on a machine the longer it lasts. Could the same be said about people? It won’t be a fair comparison as the human body has some regenerative properties but overall some have the lack of foresight to use tools available to them to lessen the physical load. Others in society will welcome the less labor output as they don’t have the same physical resources of others.
On an individual level, if goods and services can be delivered at the same price as one physically going to another location and back using your own resources, you’d already saved resources. Going to a store, or other point of purchase, consumes energy and labor. Could this be shifted to another use? Thinking, creativity, relaxation, social time? Would you use your total labor output it terms of work hours more efficiently, or reduce the number of work hours you require to get the job done?
If a physically active lifestyle is ingrained in someones mentality, then it may be harder to accept the ideals of others who promote a leisure, less physical labor life and use available saving tools to achieve it. The total physical labor of a system is decreasing and if the total amount of people able to work at physically demanding employment decreases at the same rate then the system would equalize no shift is required.
As far as those who promote a healthy robust activity filled lifestyle the leisure lifestyle may appear as an ill of society. Years ago seniors were encouraged to “get off your rocker”as a reference to sitting in a rocking chair. Now with a laptop, internet and AI assistants more can be done in less travel and labor output and as I agree physical stagnation could be a problem, it’s not always an evil thing to sit back and relax once and awhile and let the machine do the work.
Truly, laziness is not a factor if one figures better ways to use his/her labor to achieve a goal rather than avoiding or procrastinating the goal.
Rate this:
pass this along my friend....
Like this: